I am looking to export MindManager maps into a Q&A structured document
Voting Open
I am looking to export MindManager maps into a Q&A structured document
I am looking to export MindManager maps into a Q&A structured document
Hi Elny,
Can you provide a bit more detail? It’s a bit unclear whether this is a suggestion, or something you want some advice on how to do.
Hi Elny,
Can you provide a bit more detail? It’s a bit unclear whether this is a suggestion, or something you want some advice on how to do.
I should also point out that while I agree that it would be great if MindManager could be used to run the whole survey process, based on my experience (as detailed in my previous comment) this would require a range of major changes and improvements to the program.
For example, it would be helpful to be able to analyse and even graph tag and icon counts in the Map Index as well as export them to a spreadsheet. It would also be useful to be able to easily add and/or import each individual survey response as it is received across all the question topics in the survey map, ideally accompanied by an identifying tag. In addition there could be some form of tagging based on key words in the responses and the survey questionnaire should also be easily available via a web link.
These would all be great additions but it would be a lot to ask to incorporate them all at once in a program that is not designed primarily to be a survey tool. However, the ability to export tag/icon counts and to easily add individual responses or other data across the relevant topics in a map would be a good start and would also have wider applicability.
I should also point out that while I agree that it would be great if MindManager could be used to run the whole survey process, based on my experience (as detailed in my previous comment) this would require a range of major changes and improvements to the program.
For example, it would be helpful to be able to analyse and even graph tag and icon counts in the Map Index as well as export them to a spreadsheet. It would also be useful to be able to easily add and/or import each individual survey response as it is received across all the question topics in the survey map, ideally accompanied by an identifying tag. In addition there could be some form of tagging based on key words in the responses and the survey questionnaire should also be easily available via a web link.
These would all be great additions but it would be a lot to ask to incorporate them all at once in a program that is not designed primarily to be a survey tool. However, the ability to export tag/icon counts and to easily add individual responses or other data across the relevant topics in a map would be a good start and would also have wider applicability.
LLMs already help so.
i saved my conservations with LLMs into mindmanager (this is indeep a good idea, way better than using word etc, as i can "fold" branches up).
some info from LLMs
you can copy the text, then paste into LLMs and ask it to format into Q and A for you.
you have to engineer your depth of details, exactly format of the Q-A as siblings or parent-child, etc.
actually making suitable Q and A is not easy, some people developed 18 rules for that.
it's another art.
i only have MM2020.
and, AI is a paid service.
the all you can eat USD20 plan WONT let you automate your workflow;
to automate, you likely have to pay-as-you-go which is the so called "API", and every click counts you money.
so i rather stay on the old style, mm2020 and USD20 web plan.
LLMs already help so.
i saved my conservations with LLMs into mindmanager (this is indeep a good idea, way better than using word etc, as i can "fold" branches up).
some info from LLMs
you can copy the text, then paste into LLMs and ask it to format into Q and A for you.
you have to engineer your depth of details, exactly format of the Q-A as siblings or parent-child, etc.
actually making suitable Q and A is not easy, some people developed 18 rules for that.
it's another art.
i only have MM2020.
and, AI is a paid service.
the all you can eat USD20 plan WONT let you automate your workflow;
to automate, you likely have to pay-as-you-go which is the so called "API", and every click counts you money.
so i rather stay on the old style, mm2020 and USD20 web plan.
oh, someone did could obtain the token from the web plan and use as API.
but someone here say it's UNETHICAL.
oh, someone did could obtain the token from the web plan and use as API.
but someone here say it's UNETHICAL.
---