The performance difference of the search function is too obvious, I hope it can be improved

ChengLong S. shared this idea 53 days ago
Voting Open

1. I use the Windows version of MindManager, the latest version 24.1.150, and I am a formal paid user.

2. When I searched, I found that the settings of "Search Options" had a great impact on search performance.

3. When I only checked "Topic Text" and "Links", the search was fast, which I think can be called fast and satisfactory.

4. Once I checked "Notes", the search became very slow, and there was often a short "fake death" state, which greatly affected the efficiency of use.

5. Although I know that my maps often have more content, such as up to thousands of sub-topics, and many sub-topics contain note text, I still think that such performance is not satisfactory. Because Microsoft Word documents can still get search results within one second when containing much more text than this.

6. For this reason, I hope that the technical staff can arrange time to consider optimizing performance. Even if it takes up extra idle resources and file storage space, and creates embedded index data for each map file, I think it is worthwhile and acceptable.

Leave a Comment
 
Attach a file